为什么SO使用schema.org文章而不是AskAction?(Why is SO using schema.org Article instead of AskAction?)

实际上,我对一个类似于问题和答案的门户网站的schema.org实现进行了研究。 但现在我看到stackoverflow正在使用

http://schema.org/Article提问

代替

http://schema.org/AskAction和http://schema.org/ReplyAction 。

对于Q&A平台而言,问及答案是一种比文章更好的格式。

或者是否有SEO原因我们应该避免AskAction和ReplyAction ?

编辑:

或者AskAction和ReplyAction只是用于JSON格式的通信而不是像Stackoverflow这样的任何HTML上下文?

Actually I do a research on schema.org implementation for a web portal that has something like questions and answers. But now I see that stackoverflow is using

http://schema.org/Article for questions

instead of

http://schema.org/AskAction and http://schema.org/ReplyAction.

I think ask and reply is a much better format for a Q&A platform than an article.

Or is there a SEO reason why we should avoid AskAction and ReplyAction?

Edit:

Or are AskAction and ReplyAction just for communication in JSON format and not for any HTML context like Stackoverflow?

最满意答案

我认为Schema.org的行动不适合作为替代方案 。 虽然AskAction和ReplyAction确实涉及,但它们不是最终结果。

所以问题(目前是一篇Article ) 可能是AskAction的result 。

但接下来有一个问题:为什么首先要加入行动呢? 它们当然可以在Web页面上的HTML中使用,就像所有Schema.org类一样(因此它们不仅仅用于JSON-LD),但在这种情况下它可能不是很有用(仅对特殊用例有用)。

(免责声明:我从未使用Schema.org的动作,我不确定我是否正确理解它们,但这个答案反映了我目前对阅读它们的理解。)

另请注意,提出了问题解答的 Schema.org类,特别是像Stack Overflow这样的QA站点, 目前已经讨论过了 。 现在有Question 。

I don’t think Schema.org’s Actions would be suitable as alternative. While AskAction and ReplyAction are certainly involved, they are not the end result.

So the question (which is currently an Article) could be the result of an AskAction.

But then there is the question: Why bother adding the actions in the first place? They can certainly be used in the HTML on Web pages, like all Schema.org classes (so they are not for JSON-LD only), but it’s probably not very useful in such cases (resp. only useful for special use cases).

(Disclaimer: I never used Schema.org’s Actions and I’m not sure if I understand them correctly, but this answer reflects my current understanding from reading about them.)

Also note that Schema.org classes for Questions and Answers, especially for such QA sites like Stack Overflow, are proposed and currently discussed. Now there is Question and Answer.

为什么SO使用schema.org文章而不是AskAction?(Why is SO using schema.org Article instead of AskAction?)

实际上,我对一个类似于问题和答案的门户网站的schema.org实现进行了研究。 但现在我看到stackoverflow正在使用

http://schema.org/Article提问

代替

http://schema.org/AskAction和http://schema.org/ReplyAction 。

对于Q&A平台而言,问及答案是一种比文章更好的格式。

或者是否有SEO原因我们应该避免AskAction和ReplyAction ?

编辑:

或者AskAction和ReplyAction只是用于JSON格式的通信而不是像Stackoverflow这样的任何HTML上下文?

Actually I do a research on schema.org implementation for a web portal that has something like questions and answers. But now I see that stackoverflow is using

http://schema.org/Article for questions

instead of

http://schema.org/AskAction and http://schema.org/ReplyAction.

I think ask and reply is a much better format for a Q&A platform than an article.

Or is there a SEO reason why we should avoid AskAction and ReplyAction?

Edit:

Or are AskAction and ReplyAction just for communication in JSON format and not for any HTML context like Stackoverflow?

最满意答案

我认为Schema.org的行动不适合作为替代方案 。 虽然AskAction和ReplyAction确实涉及,但它们不是最终结果。

所以问题(目前是一篇Article ) 可能是AskAction的result 。

但接下来有一个问题:为什么首先要加入行动呢? 它们当然可以在Web页面上的HTML中使用,就像所有Schema.org类一样(因此它们不仅仅用于JSON-LD),但在这种情况下它可能不是很有用(仅对特殊用例有用)。

(免责声明:我从未使用Schema.org的动作,我不确定我是否正确理解它们,但这个答案反映了我目前对阅读它们的理解。)

另请注意,提出了问题解答的 Schema.org类,特别是像Stack Overflow这样的QA站点, 目前已经讨论过了 。 现在有Question 。

I don’t think Schema.org’s Actions would be suitable as alternative. While AskAction and ReplyAction are certainly involved, they are not the end result.

So the question (which is currently an Article) could be the result of an AskAction.

But then there is the question: Why bother adding the actions in the first place? They can certainly be used in the HTML on Web pages, like all Schema.org classes (so they are not for JSON-LD only), but it’s probably not very useful in such cases (resp. only useful for special use cases).

(Disclaimer: I never used Schema.org’s Actions and I’m not sure if I understand them correctly, but this answer reflects my current understanding from reading about them.)

Also note that Schema.org classes for Questions and Answers, especially for such QA sites like Stack Overflow, are proposed and currently discussed. Now there is Question and Answer.