使用@Remote（interface.class）(Use of @Remote(interface.class))

在ejb中使用@Remote（interface.class）会有什么影响吗？

换一种说法。 这有什么区别：

@Remote(MyRemoteInterface.class) @Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

和这个：

@Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

当接口看起来像这样：

@Remote public interface MyRemoteInterface {

当通过远程接口使用bean时，这两种解决方案在JBoss 6.4上运行良好。

Does the use of @Remote(interface.class) in the ejb have any impact?

In other words. What's the diference between this:

@Remote(MyRemoteInterface.class) @Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

And this:

@Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

When the inteface looks like this:

@Remote public interface MyRemoteInterface {

Both solutions works fine on JBoss 6.4 when using the bean through the remote inteface.

最满意答案

没有区别，只是它的编写方式不同，请参阅EJB 3.1规范的2.1.2：

接口可以在接口类上使用@Local或@Remote进行注释，或者在bean类上使用@Local（.class）或@Remote（.class）进行注释

There is no difference, its just different way of writing it, see 2.1.2 of the EJB 3.1 spec:

The interface can be annotated on with @Local or @Remote on the interface class, or annotated with @Local (.class) or @Remote (.class) on the bean class

使用@Remote（interface.class）(Use of @Remote(interface.class))

在ejb中使用@Remote（interface.class）会有什么影响吗？

换一种说法。 这有什么区别：

@Remote(MyRemoteInterface.class) @Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

和这个：

@Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

当接口看起来像这样：

@Remote public interface MyRemoteInterface {

当通过远程接口使用bean时，这两种解决方案在JBoss 6.4上运行良好。

Does the use of @Remote(interface.class) in the ejb have any impact?

In other words. What's the diference between this:

@Remote(MyRemoteInterface.class) @Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

And this:

@Stateless public class MyBean implements MyRemoteInterface {

When the inteface looks like this:

@Remote public interface MyRemoteInterface {

Both solutions works fine on JBoss 6.4 when using the bean through the remote inteface.

最满意答案

没有区别，只是它的编写方式不同，请参阅EJB 3.1规范的2.1.2：

接口可以在接口类上使用@Local或@Remote进行注释，或者在bean类上使用@Local（.class）或@Remote（.class）进行注释

There is no difference, its just different way of writing it, see 2.1.2 of the EJB 3.1 spec:

The interface can be annotated on with @Local or @Remote on the interface class, or annotated with @Local (.class) or @Remote (.class) on the bean class